Crisis-hit ‘Met’ lines up Scots chief for top job:

See also - Scotland’s top police officer favourite to be new Met commissioner

And click this picture to view video:

Crisis-hit ‘Met’ lines up Scots chief for top job

THE chief constable of Scotland’s biggest police force has emerged as strong favourite to become the next commissioner of the crisis-hit Metropolitan Police.

Stephen House, of Strathclyde Police, has been invited by senior Met officials to apply for the post that has been vacant since Sir Paul Stephenson resigned from his £250,000 position two weeks ago amid the furore surrounding the News of the World phone-hacking scandal.The job is regarded as one of the toughest in UK policing, and Home Secretary Theresa May and London mayor Boris Johnson have approved his candidacy.

Mr House, who left London to join Strathclyde Police, is also believed to have the support of senior Met officials. The closing date for applications to the Home Office is 12 August, and insiders said fewer than “a handful” of candidates would be considered.

The job will involve tasks such as ensuring the force cleans up its act following the hacking scandal, overseeing security measures against terror threats and safeguarding public safety at next year’s Olympics.

Mr House already has experience of major policing operations, such as the miners’ strike and the Brighton bombing. The 54-year-old Glaswegian held senior posts, including assistant commissioner and commander of the specialist crime directorate, during his time at the Met.

Rivals for the position could include officers from large metropolitan forces such as Greater Manchester Police or someone who has served at the highest level in organisations including the Association of Chief Police Officers or the Police Service of Northern Ireland

Last night, former police chiefs and police board councillors said they were not surprised at Mr House’s interest in furthering his career, and they painted a picture of an ambitious operator who appeared to have the attributes needed to succeed in leading the Met at a time of upheaval.

Christopher Mason, a member of Strathclyde Police Authority (SPA), said: “He’s amply qualified, he’s the right age, has the right experience of the Met and has the right ambition.

“He will want to distance the force from the phone-hacking scandal in every way he can, which will be a challenge, but he has the ambition to give it a go.”

Mr Mason added: “He served at a very high level when he was at the Met.

“He was Cressida Dick’s boss, the officer in command of the operation on the day Jean Charles de Menezes was shot in July 2005 at Stockwell Tube station in London, but he was on leave that day. He well understands the command response.”

Mr House, who moved to Strathclyde’s top job in 2007, is credited with taking a tough approach to violent crime in Glasgow city centre, initiating campaigns against domestic violence, sectarianism and football hooliganism and keeping a close watch on financial resources.

He has also become a leading light in the drive for a single police force for Scotland, after a hesitant start.Graeme Pearson, South of Scotland Labour MSP and former director of the Scottish Crime and Drug Enforcement Agency, said his experience of policing Strathclyde would stand Mr House in good stead compared with other possible candidates within the Met.

“Being chief constable of Strathclyde Police is a demanding job. I think that, all too often, it is thought that policing the capital city of London itself is real kudos and enough to make a fist of the top job.

“Some rise up through the system without encouraging challenges. This in not the case in Strathclyde.”

Last night, both Strathclyde Police and the Home Office said they could not confirm Mr House had been invited to apply for the job of Met commissioner.

A Strathclyde Police spokesman said: “Any decision to apply for another job is a personal decision for the chief constable.”

A spokesman for the Home Office said: “The process is still ongoing. No decisions have been taken. The advert for the commissioner appointment closes on 12 August.”

A Scottish Government spokesman said: “Stephen House is an excellent chief constable of Strathclyde Police, and this is not a matter for government to comment on.”

GD Star Rating
loading...

Towns top violent crime league table

REIGATE and Banstead had more crimes of violence against people than any other borough or district in the county last year.

Newly released Home Office figures show that Surrey is now the country’s eighth-safest county, despite topping the table in recent yearsON THE BEAT: But more crimes are committed in Reigate and Banstead than in any other part of the county.

ON THE BEAT: But more crimes are committed in Reigate and Banstead than in any other part of the county.

Robberies and burglaries from homes were up 6 per cent for 2010-2011, and the Home Office comparison of seven key offences across all local authorities in Surrey found more offences committed in Reigate and Banstead than anywhere else

But there was good news about Reigate and Banstead car crime, with theft from vehicles down 35 per cent, and tampering with motor vehicles down by 51 per cent.

Redhill, Reigate and Woodhatch Police Sergeant Karen Coyle explained: “Reigate and Banstead covers a big area and has a lot of residents.

“People think we live in a leafy area full of leafy beauty spots, but it’s not all like that. We have areas like Woodhatch and Merstham. Add in our proximity to London and the trouble we get from criminals coming in from the capital and seeing us as easy pickings, and that puts it in context.”

With 16 violent offences for every 1,000 residents, Reigate and Banstead has the second highest figure for this type of offence in the county, after Woking.

Reigate-based Neighbourhood Inspector Richard Haycock said: “You have to look behind the figures. We have the highest levels of public confidence of any police force in the country.

“My officers impose informal, common-sense resolutions every day instead of criminalising teenagers for minor offences, and the figures do not reflect this.”

Neil James is chairman of the Residents Association of Cromwell Estate in Redhill, an area which experienced a murder last year.

He believes despite the headline figures, Surrey Police are moving in the right direction.

He said: “It’s true the murder provoked interest in areas like this. There has been a police crackdown in the centre of Redhill but this can just siphon criminals off into other areas like ours.

“But by and large the police are doing a good job. We need to give those most likely to offend more to do – and of course better parenting has a big part to play.”

Julie Bond, 48, an art teacher from Quality Street in Merstham, added: “Figures can be worrying and areas like Merstham are always singled out. But the police have our support here too, and things are changing.

“It’s unfair to brand or write off any area, but I regularly see the police here and I think with community support things will turn around.”

Towns top violent crime league table

Meanwhile John Stone responds to a letter from Inspector Tom Budd in last week’s Haslemere Herald.

The following letter was published in this weeks Farnham Herald:

Another letter concerning the state of Policing in Haslemere, this time from the Neighbourhood Inspector, who says he is disappointed with what has been written and says that the poor response to Policing in the area is a myth.

A “myth” is a fictitious or unproven thing, but we need no proof of the number of front line Officers we have lost.

We all know how many we had and how many we have got now.  This is not scaremongering.

Surrey used to be the safest County in the country but according to the latest figures it has now dropped to 5th. (actually eighth, if the above is correct)

We all know what happens when a 999 call is made, it is how long it takes to respond we worry about.

As for the 4 or 5 cars in the Waverley area on each shift.  Does this include nights?  I don’t think so.

And whilst the cars out on patrol await to be relieved by the next shift who have got to brief themselves and check their vehicle at Guildford before going on the patrol, are the patrols already out clocking up overtime?

No, I don’t think so either. I drove to Hersham today and with the 1 1/2 hour journey back in heavy traffic I was on the road for a total of 2 1/4 hours.  I saw one local beat vehicle.

The Neighbourhood Survey!  It depends what questions are asked.

Bit like statistics really, you can make them do what you want.

Nuff said.

John Stone

GD Star Rating
loading...

Sky Report: ‘Met Police Tried To Cover Up Hacking’

The former Army intelligence officer at the centre of the latest hacking inquiry has told Sky News police tried to sweep his case under the carpet and accuses the Metropolitan force of endemic corruption.

Video here - http://news.sky.com/home/uk-news/article/16040640

Ian Hurst’s computer was allegedly hacked by the News Of The World (NOTW) searching for details of an IRA informer.
Scotland Yard is launching an investigation into information allegedly gathered illegally from him by a private investigator who, it is alleged, was working for the tabloid.

Mr Hurst, who spent 12 years gathering information for the Government, said: “The private investigator has admitted that he placed a computer trojan on my hard drive and obtained, over a three-month period, all the email traffic coming in and out.

“He could access social media and ostensibly surveiled [sic] me for a given period.”

Mr Hurst believes the hackers were looking for information on an informer for the IRA, called Steak-knife.

He has reams of documents relating to his case, which goes back to 2006, but he believes the police were reluctant to investigate properly at the time.

If you don’t address the source you can put 10, 50 private detectives away but you won’t remove the demand for the information.

Ian Hurst

He said if they had acted then on the information they had, it would have stopped others from becoming victims.

“It’s incredibly important that we understand the rationale for the decisions to effectively sweep this under the carpet,” he said.

Mr Hurst claims it is more than just bad policing that allowed the gathering of information to go on for so long.

He said: “Fundamentally, what lays behind this whole cesspit – not since 2006, it predates it by many years before that – we’re dealing with institutionalised corruption.

“It’s endemic within the Metropolitan Police and that has to be dealt with.”

Mr Hurst says his investigations point not only to the NOTW but other newspapers and beyond the media.

James and Rupert Murdoch

Senior Government figures are under pressure over dealings with the Murdochs

“Some of the clients that the private detectives were working for are large financial institutions, celebrities, major PR organisations.

“It’s diverse. The client is the source. They’re the people willing to pay large sums of money to obtain this unlawful information and if you don’t address the source you can put 10, 50 private detectives away but you won’t remove the demand for the information.”

Scotland Yard is now running three separate investigations: one into phone interceptions, one into computer crime and the third into police corruption.

Meanwhile, Labour has called on Prime Minister David Cameron and his most senior colleagues to “come clean” about their dealings with the Murdochs.

Senior party figures have sent out a series of letters to Cabinet ministers with more than 50 questions they say have not been addressed by the coalition in the wake of the phone-hacking scandal.

GD Star Rating
loading...

The Guardian misses the point on cannabis warnings..

….because without these figures ‘detections’ would be through the floor…

Strange police priorities in a time of austerity

With numbers being cut, officers should be focusing on crimes that seriously harm

Cannabis
More than 130,000 cannabis warnings are issued each year across England and Wales.

Burglary, sexual assault, heroin dealing, mugging, smoking cannabis, vehicle theft, assault. Which should be the highest priority for police? Too difficult to pick just one? OK, pick three. When researchers asked this question to over 1,600 people a few years ago, less than half of 1% said cannabis use should be in the top three.

This week the government released the latest figures on drug use and misuse in England and Wales. What’s striking is how little has changed in the last year, but there is an important story lurking beyond press reports focusing on the rise of mephedrone use among young people.

The latest figures confirm that levels of drug use have fallen substantially in England and Wales over the last 15 years and are currently at their lowest since recording began in the mid-1990s. This downward trend has been driven primarily by falling rates of cannabis use, especially by young people. Surprising, then, that the number of stop searches for drugs has doubled in the last 10-years and that cannabis possession still accounts for 70% of all drug offences recorded by the police. Drugs are by far and away the most common target for police-initiated encounters, accounting for as much as half of all stop searches.

Before stop and search is hailed as the solution to the drug problem, it is worth noting that drug use started to fall before the increase in drug-related stop and search activity. The concentration on low-level drug possession is even odder when we consider what is happening with burglary. Stop and search for stolen property has halved in the last 10 years, while the latest figures from the British Crime Survey indicate that burglary has increased by 14% in the last year.

The real question that this week’s figures raise is why are so many resources being spent combatting low-level drug use when other, more harmful, forms of crime are on the increase. Administering more than 130,000 cannabis warnings each year across England and Wales does little to combat serious harms to communities, while consuming vast amounts of police time and resources.

Officially, the national drug strategy calls for policing to focus on drugs that cause the most harm. When cannabis was moved to class C in 2004, enabling the police to issue a cannabis warning instead of having to issue an official caution or arrest offenders found in possession of small amounts of cannabis, this was hailed as an opportunity to “reduce the amount of time devoted to policing the possession of a drug which is undoubtedly harmful to individual health, but does not cause harm to the community on the scale of crack cocaine, cocaine or heroin”.

Instead what we’ve seen is the police spending more time on low-level cannabis possession offences. Even the government admits: “The number of drug offences recorded by the police is greatly dependent on police activities and priorities and doesn’t give a reliable indication of trends in level of drug offending.”  Research regularly shows that the police racking up scores of possession offences does little, if anything, to affect drug availability or price.

Government cuts mean up to 34,000 police personnel might lose their jobs, and while we don’t want to see the number of frontline officers being cut, we should use the harsh economic climate to ask what it is that we’re doing with the forces we still have available. What are our priorities as a society?

Policing minister Nick Herbert was right when he said: “What matters is how well money is spent and how effectively officers are deployed.” Should we really be sending officers out to find small amounts of cannabis, or should we ask them to focus on providing safe streets, responding to robberies, and supporting communities suffering from repeat victimisation? If government cuts mean fewer police being put on the streets, then careful thought should be given to what they’re being asked to do.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Front page of today’s ‘Times’:

“Forces give up on burglars and car thieves”

Police admit one in three crimes not investigated

July 30 2011 12:01AM

Police fail to investigate one in three crimes reported to them, including drug trafficking, sexual assaults and violent attacks, an investigation by The Times has revealed.

The figures are even more stark in London where almost half of all investigations are dropped after an initial screening process because officers believe that they cannot be solved.

Figures obtained by The Times for 21 of the 43 police forces in England and Wales show that the overall rate of crimes being dropped from further investigation is remarkably constant nationally and runs at about 32 per cent.

Almost 650,000 out of just over two million crimes were screened out in the past year in the 21 forces, according to responses under the Freedom of Information Act.

Conservatively, that would suggest that well over a million crimes are being disregarded each year…

Read Also: One in three crimes reported to police is not investigated as officers deem them ‘unsolvable’

GD Star Rating
loading...

Sun and Mirror fined for contempt of court

The Daily Mirror has been fined £50,000 and the Sun £18,000 for articles published over killing of Joanna Yeates

Christopher Jefferies
Christopher Jefferies: was released without charge and was entirely innocent of any involvement.

The Daily Mirror has been fined £50,000 and the Sun £18,000 for contempt of court for articles published about a suspect arrested on suspicion of murdering Joanna Yeates.

Three senior judges ruled that the tabloid newspapers breached contempt laws with their reporting of the arrest of Christopher Jefferies, Yeates’s landlord, who was later released without charge and was entirely innocent of any involvement.

Dominic Grieve, the attorney general, launched the contempt action against the newspapers in May, arguing that reports about Jefferies were “so exceptional, so memorable” that it presented a “risk of serious prejudice” to any potential future trial of Yeates’s killer.

Vincent Tabak in May pleaded guilty to manslaughter but not the murder of the 25-year-old landscape architect, who was found dead on Christmas Day near Bristol. Tabak is due to face trial at Bristol crown court in October.

The attorney general said after Friday’s ruling: “I welcome today’s judgment. While there was a great amount of speculation and copy relating to Mr Jefferies across much of the media, these three pieces of newspaper coverage were a different matter.

“They breached the Contempt of Court Act and the court has found that there was a risk of serious prejudice to any future trial. This prosecution is a reminder to the press that the Contempt of Court Act applies from the time of arrest.”

Earlier on Friday, Jefferies accepted substantial libel damages from eight newspapers – including the Daily Mirror and the Sun – over stories relating to his arrest.

In the contemptruling handed down at the high court on Friday, Lord Justice Thomas and Mr Justice Owen described the Daily Mirror articles as “extreme” and “substantial risks to the course of justice”.

The judges said the Sun’s coverage of Jefferies created a “very serious risk” that any future court defence would be damaged.

“These articles [in the Sun] would have certainly justified an abuse of process argument, and although their effect is not as grave as that of two series of articles contained in the Mirror, the vilification of Mr Jefferies created a very serious risk that the preparation of his defence would be damaged,” the judges said. “At the time when this edition of the Sun was published it created substantial risks to the course of justice. It therefore constituted a contempt under the strict liability rule.”

Sun and Mirror fined for contempt of court

GD Star Rating
loading...

Chaos at the tax office:

Chaos at the tax office: After six million pay wrong tax, MPs launch a scathing attack on ‘ineptitude’

Struggle: All is still not clear when it comes to dealing with HMRCStruggle: All is still not clear when it comes to dealing with HMRC
Millions of taxpayers are suffering because of an extraordinary catalogue of ‘ineptitude’ by HM Revenue & Customs, MPs said last night.

A damning investigation revealed the tax office to be in deep crisis, with ‘endemic delays’ and staff so overstretched that more than half of calls go unanswered, and letters are ignored for months.

The powerful Treasury Select Committee identified a litany of failure and hopelessly bad service.

Its report came in the wake of the biggest tax blunder for decades, when HMRC last year admitted that six million people had paid the wrong amount of tax in previous years.

The report found:

  • Many people had to wait as long as three months just to receive a reply to a letter
  • Just 48 per cent of telephone calls made to HMRC offices are answered
  • Those lucky enough to be answered are left on hold for minutes on end
  • The elderly are discriminated against because HMRC is transferring advice online, despite  most pensioners not having access to the internet
  • Callers are regularly given wrong information by inexperienced call centre staff.

Some 1.4million people had to fork out an average of £1,500 each last year, after underpaying because of faulty calculations by HMRC officials. Millions more received rebates.

The MPs’ report reveals for the first time that floundering staff were unable to respond to a deluge of calls from angry taxpayers, and that the failures are continuing.

For more than a year, it has collected  hundreds of readers’ letters and emails to compile a damning catalogue of shambles.

It sent the dossier of evidence to MPs, who mentioned it in a select committee hearing two months ago.

Yesterday’s criticism comes just a month after it emerged that, on top of last year’s fiasco, 1.2million people face demands to pay  hundreds of pounds in unpaid tax after  further HMRC errors.

The committee, chaired by Tory MP Andrew Tyrie, warned that unless the system was improved, people would lose all respect for the tax system, and tax avoidance might go up.

Their report concluded: ‘There is considerable dissatisfaction among the public and tax professionals with the service that Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs provides to taxpayers and benefit claimants.

‘Three areas in particular stood out in the evidence we received: access to advice over the telephone, responses to post, and offline alternatives to internet-based filing and guidance. There is a serious risk that if communicating with HMRC becomes too time-consuming, difficult and expensive, respect for the tax system, and with it voluntary compliance, may be undermined.’

Last night, Emma Boon, of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: ‘This is yet another example of HMRC’s ineptitude and again raises  questions over whether it is fit for purpose.

‘After taxpayers have put up with mistakes, the least HMRC could do is have the decency to respond to letters in a timely fashion so that taxpayers don’t worry unnecessarily. We cannot go on with the system in total disarray like this, it’s failing taxpayers.’

The committee’s report found that fewer than half of calls made to the HMRC are answered. In 2009/10, 76 per cent of calls were answered – but just a year later, this had plummeted to 48 per cent.

The MPs said: ‘HMRC’s performance at responding to telephone calls has been patchy at best and unacceptable at worst.’

A greater reliance on junior staff in call centres meant it was harder for people to deal with tax issues in one call – forcing people to make repeated calls to tax offices.

The tax advice charity Taxaid said: ‘Skills of frontline staff are definitely worse than ten to 15 years ago, when staff facing the public had much more hands-on knowledge and experience of tax.’

MPs also criticised the use of 0845 numbers, which result in high charges for people ringing on pay-as-you-go mobile phones.

In addition, for people who rely on the post, some 60 per cent of people do not get a reply within a fortnight – with many waiting more than three months.

Paul Aplin, of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, said: ‘If you chase a letter before two months the answer is “It hasn’t come to us yet”. If you wait too long, the answer is “We can’t find it”; so you have to write again and go through the process again.’

The MPs also attacked HMRC for scrapping the printing of tax advice leaflets and putting all the information online – even though more than 60 per cent of pensioners have no access to the internet.

Last night, a spokesman for HMRC said: ‘We know we have a lot more to do to improve our services to customers, but HMRC is in a much stronger position now than it was in 2010, and we plan to go further.

‘We have recruited an additional 1,000  contact centre advisers to manage exceptionally busy periods this year. We welcome the committee’s report.’

GD Star Rating
loading...

One Hundred Editions of The Old & Bold Newsletter!

The August edition of the Old & Bold newsletter is being circulated to members.

It is the 100th edition of the electronic newsletter sent out to SPRCA members.

Congratulations and well done to our Editor, Bob Bartlett, on having the idea in the first place and sticking with it.  

Since it’s inception in May 2003 it has gone from strength to strength due to his perseverance and long may it continue.

In celebration I have prepared a little video with the words to be sung to the tune of McNamara’s Band.

GD Star Rating
loading...

MPA whispers: Bernard Hogan-Howe to be next Met Commissioner

If you watched this morning’s Metropolitan Police Authority meeting you’ll have seen the silent figure of acting Deputy Commissioner Bernard Hogan-Howe sitting alongside acting Commissioner Tim Godwin.

According to several MPA members what you also saw was future Met Commissioner Bernard Hogan-Howe sitting alongside his Deputy Commissioner Tim Godwin.

If he really is a contender to succeed Sir Paul Stephenson, Hogan-Howe’s prospects are hardly likely to be harmed by MPA Chair Kit Malthouse’s revelation that his family consider his tenure as head of Merseyside police as the force’s “golden age”.

For those unfamiliar with their perhaps-next Commissioner, Wikipedia summarises his career as follows: (sorry Robin, already in the article…)

“Before joining Merseyside, Hogan-Howe worked as District Commander of the Doncaster west area, serving with South Yorkshire Police.

“In 1997, he joined Merseyside Police as Assistant Chief Constable of Community Affairs, moving onto area operations in 1999. Hogan-Howe then joined the Metropolitan Police as Assistant Commissioner of Human Resources, in July 2001.

“He was the Chief Constable of Merseyside Police from 2004 to 2009, when he was appointed to Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary..”

Perhaps even more important than the endorsement of the Malthouse family, my MPA whisperers say Hogan-Howe has the gravitas many have long wanted in the Met’s top cop.

For the avoidance of any doubt generated by City Hall briefings, the MPA’s website makes clear:

“The appointment will be made by Her Majesty the Queen following a recommendation by the Home Secretary under the Police Act 1996.

“Before making this recommendation the Home Secretary will have regard to any recommendation made to her by the MPA and any representations from the Mayor of London. The successful applicant will be appointed in September 2011 at the latest. The appointment will be for a period of five years*.”

(*Unless sacked by BoJo sooner… Thinking )

GD Star Rating
loading...

Sarah Payne: Detective’s phone ‘hacked’

A police officer involved in the investigation into the murder of schoolgirl Sarah Payne has said he believes his phone may have been hacked by the News of the World.

Detective Chief Inspector Martyn Lewis, who was second-in-command of the Sussex Police investigation into the 2000 killing, said he had now reported his concerns to Scotland Yard’s Operation Weeting inquiry.

The claim follows the disclosure that Sarah’s mother, Sara Payne, may have had her phone hacked by the News of the World, despite having worked closely with the paper to campaign for tougher child protection laws.

Mr Lewis said he initially became suspicious some time in 2002 or 2003 when he was telephoned at home by a News of the World executive threatening to publish a story about him which concerned the Payne family.

He said he told the executive that the story was completely untrue and warned he would sue if the paper ran it. In the event, nothing appeared.

“The fact they didn’t run the story would suggest their source was illegal and if I had admitted what the executive asked me they would have run the story and because I didn’t they didn’t run the story,” he told BBC Radio 4′s The World at One.

“I was the main (police) contact with Sara. Sara over a period of time became my friend and we often left each other lengthy voicemails which were intimate, because we are friends, and which could be misinterpreted or this allegation about the Payne family could have been construed from it.”

He said that the calls had been made on a police mobile which also contained voicemail messages relating to other investigations.

“On that case and on other cases I was running covert inquiries, sensitive inquiries, that would have been the subject of answer phone messages,” he said.

The chairman of the Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee, John Whittingdale, said that it was another “appalling” allegation.

“People were very shocked to discover Sarah Payne’s phone may have been hacked. Obviously to hack into a police officer’s phone raises whole other questions,” he said.

Payne detective’s phone ‘hacked’

GD Star Rating
loading...