When is a police officer not a police officer? (2)

CSO'sAre these police officers? (Could well be…)

Avon and Somerset PCSOs’ power of arrest considered

The new Chief Constable of Avon and Somerset Police is to consider giving Police Community Support Officers (PCSOs) the power of arrest.

Nick Gargan said he would also review the equipment provided to them.

Most members of the area’s police and crime panel said they would support the move.

But the local Police Federation warned it could lead to PCSOs being used as a cheaper alternative to trained police officers.

There are currently 384 PCSOs in Avon and Somerset.

Since 2007, the Chief Constable of each force has had the discretion to give their PCSOs the power of arrest.

British Transport Police PCSOs can arrest people in the West’s railway stations, but Avon and Somerset PCSOs do not have that power.

‘Powerful message’

Mr Gargan said: “The PCC [Police and Crime Commissioner Sue Mountstevens] and I have discussed that this week she will be formally asking me to review the powers of PCSOs in Avon and Somerset.

“Are you going to start supplying them with CS spray, cuffs, batons?”

Kevin Phillips Avon and Somerset Police Federation

“I will take this opportunity to also review the equipment provided to PCSOs.”

Ms Mountstevens said she was still considering her view on the matter.

But she said: “I think it’s a very powerful message to get out there that PCSOs could have arrest powers.”

Most members of the police and crime panel which scrutinises her actions said they favoured more powers for PCSOs.

Chairman Nigel Ashton said: “What the panel said was that PCSOs need to be more effective… and perhaps in order to do that they need to have greater powers.

“Across the country different commanders have given PCSOs different powers, including that of arrest, and I think a number of people… think our PCSOs should also have the power of arrest.”

‘Power to detain’

But Kevin Phillips, chairman of the Avon and Somerset Police Federation, said the distinction between police officers and PCSOs should remain.

“I think you’ve got to clarify exactly what [the power of arrest] means for PCSOs,” he said.

“The power to arrest is actually the power to detain. It’s not necessarily a power to arrest and transport them to custody.

“If you give somebody the power to detain, are you going to start supplying them with CS spray, cuffs, batons? That comes at a cost and that’s what you’ve got to be looking at.

“We need to make sure police officers are given the support and the equipment they need to do their job. PCSOs are an additional layer.”

Councillor Pete Levy, who sits on the police and crime panel, said: “We don’t want to see the role of the PCSOs undermine that of the warranted police officers. We do want to see PCSOs given their rightful place in the community.”

See: When is a police officer not a police officer? (1)

GD Star Rating
loading...

When is a police officer not a police officer? (1)

Are these police officers?

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-R-tYddHeCB0/UJ-7VWwPjHI/AAAAAAAAAwo/iktT9QhR53Q/s1600/20121110_001951-1.jpg

Are these police officers?

Got to be a police officer surely??!!

NOPE! NON OF THE ABOVE ARE POLICE OFFICERS!

It might surprise you to know that the officers shown above in psuedo police uniforms are Newham Borough Council wardensIt would seem that they have been masquerading as police officers since 2005 as this blogger points out: -

How Is This Not Impersonating a Police Officer?

Back in 2005, Newham council’s former Head of Legal Services, Amanda Kelly, was commissioned to undertake an independent external investigation [PDF] into the borough’s Crime and Anti-Social Behaviour Division Community Constabulary. This followed allegations of mismanagement and serious misconduct by some its ‘Community Constables’, which included unlawful stop and search operations, illegal possession of potentially lethal extendable batons while on duty and an allegation that a member of the Constabulary’s staff had handcuffing a Stratford resident.

In the course of her investigation, Kelly found that as a result of the gradual adoption of police ranks and titles and the choice of Hertfordshire police as its uniform supplier, the appearance of council staff patrolling Newham’s streets was “almost indistinguishable from police officers”. As a result, Community Constables had started to behaviour as if they actually possessed police powers when they did not. The council had allowed, in effect, the growth of a private quasi-police force in the borough.

Another blogger at Mike Law’s Blog also asks the question in his post: –

Should the Council dress staff in police uniforms? Another case for scrutiny.

So why is this a problem? Newham Council has been down this path before and it didn’t work out too well. The Council had established a parks constabulary service – a perfectly legal entity for any London borough to form – which had the remit of patrolling the parks and green spaces of Newham. The constabulary officers had limited powers to enforce a number of local by-laws. Over time, mission creep set in and, as the parks constabulary was a subsection of the antisocial behaviour unit, constabulary officers were being sent to deal with ASB incidents away from the parks.

Because the constabulary officers were spending a considerable amount of time dealing with incidents that were not in parks, some bright spark had the idea that they should be re-branded as Newham’s “Community Constabulary”. This went ahead even though there is nothing in law that recognises or legitimises such a service.

Slowly but surely the office of constable is being eroded… Teeth

My thanks to Dave Powell for drawing my attention to the above and also to this post.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Grammar fools

Mid Devon district council’s removal of apostrophes from street signs is really banana’s

Mid Devon would be proud: without an apostrophe, this crescent loses its regal ownership

There are few things more aggravating, to a certain kind of mind, than a wrongly placed apostrophe. The seemingly innocuous punctuation mark drives otherwise calm people to fury.

The latest battle in this long war is being fought on the South Coast, where Mid Devon district council has infuriated local grammarians by removing the symbol from all street signs. Beck’s Square will become Becks Square; St George’s Well will no longer belong to St George. The Plain English Campaign has called the move “nonsensical”.

Councillors should have foreseen the row. When Waterstone’s became Waterstones, spoof pictures appeared on the internet showing a homeless apostrophe, with a sign saying: “Will denote contractions or possessives for food.”

Homeless apostropheIt’s hard not to feel sympathy, though, since apostrophe misuse is so widespread, not merely on grocers’ signs but in professional writing. The council must have grown tired of seeing apostrophes where they were not called for and none where they were.

Still, it is a defeat. Mid Devon has given up the punctuation struggle; another redoubt has fallen. Language changes, yes, but apostrophes are vital. After all, they’re the difference between “Don’t worry about dinner, I’ll eat our son’s” and “Don’t worry about dinner, I’ll eat our sons.

Grammar fools

See also: Waterstones: O apostrophe, where art thou?…

GD Star Rating
loading...

‘Slightly disheartening, this exaggerated faith in formal qualifications’

‘Play safe and always avoid risk’ is a sad lesson to teach our children

Kids these days have an exaggerated faith in formal qualifications over practical experience. What’s wrong with them?

Newcastle schoolboys of yesteryear get some practical experience at a locomotive exhibition at Manors North Station, 16th October 1933

The event had been set up to help children at a secondary school with career advice and, perhaps because the theme was working in the creative industries, it was well-attended.

The questions most frequently asked of me were: What qualifications do you need to become a writer? What training would you recommend? How do you become a writer?

My replies – “none”, “none” and “get writing” – were clearly not what the children expected. A more substantial career ladder seemed to have been envisaged. When I suggested that sometimes the best way of finding out what you want to do in life is to take a chance, to have a go at something and see what you can do, young faces looked at me with open scepticism. That, the unspoken message seemed to be, is not how it works these days.

It was odd, and slightly disheartening, this exaggerated faith in formal qualifications. Bright and motivated, the children were already convinced that, without the right exams on the way to their chosen career, no one would take them seriously. In effect, their caution was not that far from the deadly company ethic of the pre-1960s when the highest ambition inculcated into school-leavers was to find the security of a job for life.

The economy is only partly to blame for this new mood of anxiety. According to the clinical psychologist Professor Tanya Byron, children are being raised at every turn to fear risk, and particularly the risk of failure. In the educational magazine SecEd, Professor Byron argues that rigid teaching around core curricula means that children are not thought to think, or indeed to feel, for themselves.

At home, their parents are often fearful of danger, both physical and temperamental. Failures, even the small ones, are seen as life-changing setbacks from which it may be impossible to recover. Cosseted and nagged on all sides by a culture of competitive anxiety, children learn to distrust the unconventional and individual, to see taking a chance on something that may not work out as irresponsible and risky.

The effect, according to Prof Byron, is not simply that originality, flair and enterprise are dampened rather than encouraged. Increasing numbers of bright children from secure backgrounds suffer in their everyday lives. “There is real concern that we have a generation of young people massively lacking  in emotional resilience.”

Caution, aversion to any risk, anxiety about not jumping through the right hoops, a fear of not taking the conventional route to a socially accepted career: what a grim, life-denying legacy this is for one generation to pass on to the next.

Terence Blacker

And Terence can also compose music – Excellent ….!

Sad Old Bastards With Guitars

Me & my guitar: A love story

GD Star Rating
loading...

Nick Herbert Does A Kenny Everett

More and more headlines in the papers are becoming more and more depressing to read.  The Times today reportsNo Country For Old Men’ ‘A welcome report that shows a shocking and widespread failure in British care’

‘According to a report by the Care Quality Commission almost a third of care homes are failing on basic standards of care. And, by basic they do mean basic. One in five, for example, is failing to feed people properly. The elderly are not another species, or guests from elsewhere. They are our future, and their neglect is our scandal.’

This is not new news as many papers have reported it over the past year and court cases have highlighted the shocking way in which many people have been treated in old age.  As the Times correctly points out ‘the elderly are not another species’.  But the situation is not helped by the current government which seems to take great delight in blaming older people for the countries present woes and does not like the fact that many still live in long term family homes where they have fond memories of raising their families.  Get out they say, you should downsize and do more for the young.  They also say, ‘go back to work as well as downsize’ you should be ‘taxed out of your home if you are over 60’

As somebody approaching his three score years and ten I find it amazing that equal opportunities do not seem to apply to older people.  Human rights are oft quoted but let us not forget that those rights do not stop upon reaching the age of 60 years.  Articles are enshrined in the act that protect people from Inhuman Treatment, (Article 3), and a Right to Privacy, (Article 8).  It also gives the Right to Life, (Article 2), so as we get older we should be worried when we read about the burgeoning NHS use of ‘the death pathway’

This government is not only making older people feel very uncomfortable about breathing but it also stoking up a one sided argument about the UK leaving the EU and in today’s paper we read that Nick Herbert says, ‘Let’s quit the European Court of Human Rights’.  Yes, this is the same Nick Herbert who said PCC’s were a good idea and then threw his teddy in the corner when he did not get promoted for introducing them as the ‘Pink News’ reports here.

His reasons for wanting to leave the ECHR was over the right of prisoners to get the vote but as with all things he is using one issue to impose his will, (and that of the government), over all of the people.  Let us not forget that, for all its faults, the ECHR is the only place where anybody can take a grievance and get it fairly heard when all else fails.  It may result in some bizarre verdicts but I for one would rather that protection than rely solely on an out of control bunch of right wingers who are in the process of dismantling that last bastion of peoples rights in the UK, the police and the court system.

Recently, much to the chagrin of the government, the ECHR has found in favour of expat taxpayers in relation to the winter fuel payments and, at this moment, a 92-year-old WW2 veteran living in Italy is fighting the UK government in the ECHR over his right to vote.

It is a pity then that the UK government is so economical with the truth when it comes to issues in Europe.  Whilst I would be the first to say that Europe is not perfect and the UK should continue to fight for a better deal where it can, this should not be to the exclusion of those people who have worked hard for and fought hard for their country of birth.  Without any shadow of a doubt, there are many people living in the UK and elsewhere who are grateful to have somewhere they can take a grievance to when all the avenues in the UK have been exhausted.  At the moment that place is the ECHR.

So do I trust a Prime Minister who has taken vengeance on the best police service in the world just because he lost the last fight he had with them?  NO!

Do I trust a Prime Minister who was telling European MP’s they should be paid less and  whose official said today at the EU Budget conference….

“These are not dramatic changes. The commission and others are telling the Greeks, the Italians and others that they should put the retirement age up to 68. In the UK we have cut [public sector] pensions to a career average salary. They argue that it is very difficult legally to change people’s terms and conditions. Well, we have managed it in the UK.”

……but at the same time has failed spectacularly to reign in UK MP’s expenses and pensions and also failed to increase their own retirement age? NO!

Do I trust an MP who continues to privatise important institutions such as care homes for the elderly and then does a ‘Pontius Pilate’ when it goes wrong: NO!

We should be careful what we wish for and we should look at all the evidence available.  We should not just listen to the latest rant from an MP but protect ourselves and our nearest and dearest from a free for all and read between the lines when MP’s start to tell us what is in our best interests.  If younger people think that they will be treated any differently later in life than older people in the UK are now they are in for a shock.  They should be fighting for older people’s rights now, as with any luck, they will be old themselves one day.

I cannot help but compare Nick Herbert’s rant about ‘Let’s quit the European Court of Human Rights’ with a similar, but tongue in cheek rant that Kenny Everett made back in 1983 when he ranted at the Tory Conference of that year, ‘Let’s Bomb Russia’.

The difference being of course that Kenny was joking, Nick Herbert is not…. Pissed Off

READ IN TODAY’S TELEGRAPH: Home care: elderly urged to reclaim human rights

And see: Generation who refuse to grow up:

Plus: The women who think they’re too clever to have babies

‘They’re educated with dynamic careers – and believe motherhood is beneath them. Warning: their views make incendiary reading…’

GD Star Rating
loading...

Important message for AOL (America On-Line) mail users

I’ve just discovered that no mail is being accepted by AOL’s mail servers from the old-and-bold.info domain… bizarrely, although the SMTP rejection message gives a short notification about the rejection, no information whatsoever is provided as to why the block has suddenly been put in place, nor is there a simple e-mail contact address provided for AOL’s ‘postmaster’ so that affected domain owners take up the issue with them.

And, of course, I can’t e-mail them because… they are rejecting all e-mail from the mail server’s IP address! There IS a long and drawn-out administrative process for raising a support ticket, but in my experience such tickets are often ignored and AOL requires a number of steps to be undertaken to provide (largely irrelevant) technical information for them to think about whilst they decide whether to undo what they shouldn’t have done in the first place. At the present time, I don’t have time to waste on such a potentially futile exercise, but I might get round to it some time over the weekend.

So, it’s just a long shot, but if any of you AOL users out there happen to be reading this blog entry, now you know why you are no longer receiving Relay messages. To be frank, I have little patience for this sort of behaviour from a mail provider that, however large, is so incompetent and/or arrogant that it doesn’t bother to observe the usual niceties in such situations, which is to provide information to the postmasters of affected domains about why such a step has been taken and whom to contact directly to resolve issues of this sort.

So, I’m afraid that if the affected AOL users out there – that’s 63 of you! – would like to continue to receive communications from Old and Bold, nothing is going to happen very quickly at this end… you might want to contact the relevant Customer Support department at AOL and demand to know why it is blocking you from receiving your ‘opt-in’ e-mail from this domain… particularly as you are paying them for your service! Tell them they have blocked this domain and are sending a 554 error for a reason that they refer to as “CONB1″. Or you could just cut and paste this post and e-mail it to them, telling them to sharpen up, get a grip, and start behaving as though they know what they are doing!

It could be that this situation has been caused by a few of those same AOL users marking Old and Bold messages as unsolicited bulk commercial e-mail (“spam”)… but as most members will know, we don’t send out anything in bulk whatsoever other than “Relay” messages. At least now you know why AOL membership has been steadily and rapidly declining for some years… they’ve clearly no idea how to perform as an Internet Service Provider if they think this is a sensible way of interacting with postmasters of other domains.

Rant over… and, rest assured, the other 1.027 unaffected members should still be receiving Relay messages without any problems!

GD Star Rating
loading...

“SOME GRATITUDE. SOME LOYALTY”

Surrey Heath, and the surrounding area, has a long and honourable connection with the Armed Forces of this country.

The RLC Depot at Deepcut, the Medical Services Depot at Mytchett, and the nearby military town at Aldershot have helped form this connection. However, due to political intransigence and short-sightedness, this local connection will be greatly diminished, or even removed.

A short time ago, David Cameron and rest of the Conservative hierarchy praised the men and women of the Armed Forces for coming to their rescue by preventing, assisted by hundreds of  Police officers drafted in, a multi-million Pound humiliating catastrophe over the security of the 2012 Olympic Games.

Without those servicemen and women, who had to live in extremely sub-standard accommodation for the duration of the Games, it is likely that David Cameron would have become an international laughing stock and unable to raise his head anywhere on the public stage (unless he put all the blame onto Boris Johnson) and, some have said, would have led to a General Election.

Now that the Games have ended, David Cameron and his Ministers and Secretaries of Defence have shown their gratitude and loyalty by a draconian culling of the British Armed Forces.  Some gratitude.  Some loyalty.

Many Service personnel returned from Aghanistan and Iraq, expecting to spend some time on leave with their families, but instead, found themselves digging this government out of a hole.  That they did so with humour, competence and courtesy for all visitors, tells you more about the calibre of this country’s Armed Forces than it does for their political masters.

In a few years time, this country will have the lowest level of military personnel since the 1700’s, at a time when terrorism, both at home and abroad, is on the increase and which the Armed Forces and Police will be expected to deal with.  It appears that there is no one in Government with the ability, or will, to admit that you can’t just open a box, take some soldiers out and then put them back when you don’t need them any more. The message the government is giving to those considering a career in the Armed Services is that, “We will use you, we will abuse you, and then we will throw you away when we consider you are no longer needed.”  Rudyard Kipling certainly had the right idea about politicians and the military.

In the near future, many Service personnel will return from the Middle East, not to a well deserved hero’s welcome, but to a P45.  Some gratitude.  Some loyalty.

All this comes at a time when Mr Cameron, aided by Tom Winsor and Theresa May, is decimating the Police Service of this country.  Mr Winsor, you may recall, recently wrote and submitted ‘independent’ reports on the future structure of the Police.

Recommendations include, an increase of pension contributions from 11% to up to 14%; to serve a longer period of time for a lower pension; retirement to be increased either from 30 years to 35 years service or from a normal retirement age of 55 years to 60 years; entry to the Police at a supervisory level to those who have a proven record of managerial experience (lack of Police knowledge or expertise would not be a barrier); any permanent injuries, which affect the ability to carry out ‘front line’ duties, to result in a reduction in salary in the short term and termination of employment in the long term (under these particular circumstances, David Rathband would have been put on reduced salary and then sacked after 6 months); and new terms of service that that Police offers be treated as normal employees, yet not be allowed the rights those other employees enjoy.

Mr Winsor, who is a partner in the firm advising on private companies carrying out tasks currently done by Police officers or Police staff, and who has recently commenced his David Cameron sponsored role as Inspector of Constabulary, has given an assurance that his report was completely independent, despite much of it bearing an uncanny similarity to the content of a speech made by David Cameron in 2006.  I believe him.  Mind you, I also believe that Elvis Presley is alive and well and stacking trolleys for Tesco at The Meadows!

I recently wrote to Michael Gove, my MP, when these proposals were first made known, voicing my concern.  I did so, not only as a constituent, but as someone with a total of 43 years service in the British Army and the Surrey Police. In my letter I asked him if he would be happy with 59 year old Police officers dealing with Public Order offences in Camberley High Street and that the operations to deal with them were controlled by an ex manager of Poundland, (not that I have anything against Poundland or the ability of its managers).  His response caused an equal amount of astonishment and concern, coming as it did from an obviously intelligent man.

It may be somewhat poignant that I wrote the first draft of this letter on National Police Memorial Day, where the Home Secretary spoke about the debt we owe as a society to those Police officers who have given their lives in their service to the community.  After that, she no doubt returned to her office to continue plans to completely ignore the sacrifices of PCs Fiona Bone, Nicola Hughes, Sharon Beshenivsky, David Rathband and so many others.  Some gratitude.  Some loyalty.

There are only two organisations in this country which stand between order and anarchy and David Cameron seems intent in destroying both of them.  Some gratitude.  Some loyalty.

If there was a viable political alternative, would this treacherous government really deserve to be re-elected?”

===========

I have sent the above to the Camberley News and Mail, either as a letter or an unsolicited article. Of course, being in an area where Dolly the Cloned Sheep would be elected if she wore a blue rosette, I have little chance of it being published. Still, I continue to follow in the steps of my literary hero Don Quixote – continually tilting at windmills – though I already have my Esmeralda keeping an eye on me!

GD Star Rating
loading...

Police Force Train Dogs to Headbutt, (you’re kidding…)

by K9 Magazine

You really couldn’t make it up… a Welsh police force is training its dogs to headbutt criminals rather than bite them, because politically correct – ‘PC’ – bosses are afraid that allowing the dogs to bite criminals will infringe their human rights!

The policy, devised by North Wales Police, comes as a result of increased compensation claims from members of the public who have been bitten by police dogs, writes Nick Mays.

Officers say the toothless tactic provides a safer way to tackle uncooperative offenders, and dog squads may soon adopt it across the country. But critics say it is another example of political correctness gone mad – putting the rights and safety of criminals before cutting crime and protecting the public.

Rather than biting suspects, the dogs have instead been trained to disable their targets by leaping at them and delivering a flying ‘head-butt’.

The scheme, pioneered by North Wales police was headed by controversial chief Richard Brunstrom, using the Belgian Shepherd Malinois, which are fast becoming the police dogs of choice in the UK, as they are smaller, more agile and stronger than the traditional German Shepherd.

Under the scheme, the dogs would be muzzled to prevent them from biting. To protect the animals, a metal rod across the front of the muzzle helps absorb the impact of the strike.

‘Instead of biting, the dog is muzzled and launches itself like a missile at the midriff of the target,’ said Deputy Chief Constable of North Wales, Clive Wolfendale.

‘It is one of the additional options open to us to muzzle our dogs and get them to use a head butt,’ added Sgt Ian Massie. ‘We believe it is a safer option for an offender to be head-butted.’

The scheme was launched after the Association of Chief Police Officers published a paper for dog handlers on human rights. In it, police dog handlers in a position where they are considering setting their dog after a suspect should ask are told to ask themselves: ‘Are there human rights issues involved in what I am about to do?’

But retired dog handler John Barrett, who served for 18 years with the Metropolitan Police, is critical of the new tactic and said: ‘This sounds like political correctness. It is very strange – I think the public would laugh at you with a muzzled dog, and it could be counterproductive if people think the dog has to be muzzled because it is dangerous.’

The move comes after a surge in compensation claims from bite victims – including officers. One of the UK’s biggest police forces, Greater Manchester paid out £59,000 in compensation in five years.

But alleged wrongdoers are warned – the dogs have a powerful butt, especially after a long run-up.

The force’s Dog Section Manager Sergeant Gareth Crow, who pioneered the technique, says the flying Malinois head-charge is the equivalent of a baton blow if the dog has a full run-up. Apparently, the technique has been deemed so successful that muzzled dogs are also being used for crowd control at football games. Sgt Crowe said: “People may think a muzzled dog can’t do anything but they are caught out by the power and speed of the tactic.

‘For me, it is a high-level use of force to physically bite a person. We’ve now got a continuum of force that gives us another tactical option to deploy the dog.

‘The ‘conflict management model’ of policing says that any force must be reasonable under the circumstances. It is clearly to gain control, prevent injury to the officer or others, and prevent damage to property.’

Sgt Crow did not say, however, how the dogs would manage to headbutt a suspect in the stomach when they were running away from them and would thus have their backs to the dogs. A headbutt into the suspects’ lumbar region would surely cause greater injury and lead to further compensation claims.

North Wales Police Chief Constable Richard Brunstrom earlier this year faced criticism from within his own ranks for plans to award his officers points for making arrests or handing out fines. Under the scheme, they could receive twice as many for seizing an abandoned car as for making an arrest.

Mr Brunstrom, the Government’s adviser on road safety and speed cameras, has earned himself the nickname the ‘Mad Mullah of the Traffic Taliban’.

In 2003, he called for the number of cameras to be trebled and the following year admitted getting officers to ‘hide behind road signs and walls’ with handheld devices.

His force has also been criticised for its appalling burglary clear up rate and for launching costly inquiries into alleged anti-Welsh comments by Tony Blair and Anne Robinson.

==============

…and here is another ‘innovative’ idea to play with. 

How about removable dentures so that dogs have a ‘nasty suck’ capability..Pissed Off

Plus:

Introducing: The New Politically Correct Police Dog With New Dentures Fitted.

GD Star Rating
loading...

I have been trying to avoid a rant but..

Shot PCs: Man Arrested Over Facebook Page

A 22-year-old man has been arrested after an offensive Facebook page was set up following the deaths of PCs Nicola Hughes and Fiona Bone.

Several similar Facebook sites were set-up within hours of news that the two officers were shot dead after answering a routine call in Manchester.

Comments on one of the pages praised Dale Creegan as a ‘hero’ who should be awarded an OBE and suggested more officers should be killed.

One user who posted to one of the pages refered to himself as ‘bullet-tooth tony’ and wrote: “dale cregan u legend”.

The posts attracted widespread condemnation from police colleagues of the shot officers and from the general public.

In a statement to journalists, Assistant Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, Garry Shewan, said: “Tuesday’s tragedy has touched many people’s lives.

“As the public have been watching in from the outside, they’ll have seen the hurt and the pain this tragedy has caused police and the public and those who support policing in Greater Manchester.

“Social media has given people the facility to say how they feel about the loss they’ve experienced.

“But there are also a number of people who use social media in a very malicious and offensive way. We’ve become very aware that derogatory and offensive comments have been posted on social media websites.”

“We received reports of at least one Facebook account had been set up with derogatory comments about the tragedy of Tuesday’s events and last night, Merseyside police arrested a 22-year-old male from the Netherley area of Merseyside.”

Despite the arrest, the overwhelming message on social media sites remained one of support and a Facebook page was set-up by members of the public.

A Twitter hashtag #coverforgmp was also started, with more than 2,700 police officers from forces around the country offering their time to allow GMP officers and staff to attend the funerals.

As this is not my site but a site for retired comrades I will let another blogger, Anna Raccoon answer for me.  I hope she will not mind me lifting this extract from her blog but you can read the full post at: -

Land of the Rising Scum…

by Anna Raccoon on September 19, 2012

We have a feral underclass. It is a statement many bloggers make daily – but we do not think too deeply about it. We don’t go out in the morning, leave food out for the cat, drop our kids off at child care – and then walk into the feral lair.

We talk of the morons with “cut here” tattooed on their neck – we don’t invite them into our car ‘to answer questions’.

We avoid dangerous areas. We don’t walk up to empty council houses in the full knowledge that the local community are well aware that a double murderer, a drug dealer and armed criminal, a man given to lobbing hand grenades at those who offend him, is hiding somewhere in the area.

Today, tonight, in the dark of the night, after two police women were blown to smithereens, other police will be clocking onto duty; understaffed, under equipped, underpaid, under appreciated, and walking back into that feral lair – on our behalf.

They will be doing more than just walking back into the lair. They will be in Hyde Police station addressing Dale Cregan as “Mr Cregan”; they will make sure he has a cup of tea at regular intervals; when his solicitor says he is tired, they will stop the interview, call it a day; they won’t kick his other eye out, though who could blame them if they wanted to behave as the Thai police did; they will keep their temper, aware that the IPCC will monitor their every utterance, their every move. They will do that even as they mourn their colleagues – some may even have to miss the funeral to ensure Dale Cregan’s safety.

For Dale Cregan will be in full possession of his ‘uman rites’. Why do you think he gave himself up  - a sudden fit of conscience? Perchance he didn’t fancy spending a couple of weeks sleeping in a drainage ditch, with a failed footballer and a cold Chinese for company. He knew the safest place for him was right in the heart of ‘those murderous scum’ that he so detests. He knew he could rely upon their professionalism to keep him safe. We ask too much of these men and women.

It makes no difference that those two officers were women. They were not killed because they were women, but because they represent ‘the enemy’ to a feral sub-culture. There is a war out there, one that has become so mundane to the media that most of us were unaware that life in Manchester included hand grenades being lobbed around and double murderers on the loose.

We are shocked – and supportive – when the army suffers deaths from the people they are supposed to be helping. Yet there is a sector of the Internet that is happy to label all police as scum – and thus foster the belief that whatever happens to them, they deserve it. They don’t.

These are ordinary men and women, doing a job. Without their painstaking efforts day after day, we will all find ourself living in a land ruled by the increasingly violent feral under class.

I feel for the ordinary men and women who have to live in an area like Hyde. Who have to live cheek by jowl with the likes of Dale Cregan. Though they can at least keep their heads down, avoid the pubs that the likes of Cregan frequent, and try to stay out of trouble.

Not so the Police. They, men and women, have to engage with the Cregan’s on a daily basis. Two young girls, answering a call regarding a suspected burglary, an empty house, nothing of value could have been taken, but there are targets for answering calls from members of the public, and they must be met. They could have been ‘meeting targets’ in a call centre, but they weren’t. In return, they were not just shot, but blown up.

Theresa May thinks that the ‘family’, as they were described tonight by Ian Hanson, their federation representative, can be replaced by civilians. That their pay can be compared to that of other civil servants. That their pensions can be slashed and self funded. That they are mere objects, pawns to be moved around the Crown board.

I had to stop writing this last night, Martin Brunt on Sky so enraged me fretting that Cregan ‘might not get a fair trial’ owing to the heartfelt and emotional comments of the Manchester Chief Constable who had just lost a ‘bubbly’ 23 year old, and a ‘shy’ 32 year old from his force. Who had had to explain how it could have happened to that young girl’s fiancée, and the families of both officers. Who had had to talk to other young officers, off for the night to see if they could find the murderous Cregan’s accomplices in the shady cracks and crevices of Mottram’s feral backside. They’ll have a stick of wood and a stab proof vest – and the remains of a pension – to give them courage.

Dear God, give me strength.

They deserve better, much better. Before we find out what life would be like without them

And before you ask, to the best of my knowledge ‘Anna Raccoon’ is not nor has ever been a police officer so I post this extract as a quote from a member of the public who has said it like it is.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Update on Google Mail problem affecting Blueyonder, NTLWorld, and Virgin mail accounts

You will no doubt recall the item that I posted here about how Google have broken the e-mail service that they provide for other ISPs, because of changes that they made in early May 2012 to the way that their servers accept (or rather, don’t accept!) e-mail from the Internet.

The problem affects anyone with an e-mail address ending:

– blueyonder.co.uk
– ntlworld.com
– virginmedia.com
– virgin.net

The update is depressing, and not good news… Google still doesn’t even accept that they have a problem, and nothing has been done to fix it.

So, if your e-mail address ends with one of the above domain names, the only thing that you can be certain of is that some e-mail addressed to you by other people isn’t being delivered to you – and there’s nothing that you can do except to complain to your ISP that Google is not providing them with the service that your ISP and indirectly, you, are paying for. I can say with certainty that you are not getting all Relay messages from the SPRCA.

If anyone wants more of the technical detail, you can find it here or search for “Multiple destination domains per transaction is unsupported” on (ha!) Google…

In the meantime, as stated before, the only thing that you can do if Google doesn’t fix it is to change ISP, but I appreciate the hassle that such a step represents.

Frown

GD Star Rating
loading...

Time to change your e-mail provider?

I’m posting this to advise users of the following e-mail domains about a problem that prevents them from receiving all of their e-mails.  I don’t know if their providers are keeping them up-to-date with what’s going on, but I doubt it.

The problem affects anyone with an e-mail address ending:

– blueyonder.co.uk
– ntlworld.com
– virginmedia.com
– virgin.net

The e-mail facilities for each of these domains is provided by Google, who recently changed the settings on their inbound e-mail servers so that they would only accept mail for one domain at a time.  The problem is that they also provide the same mail servers for each of these domains – so any mail messages addressed to more than one of these domains will only get delivered to the first one – the servers refuse to accept the rest!

There are world-wide rules for e-mail, defined by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), rules known as RFCs.  What Google has done doesn’t break any of these rules, because it only affects the customers that use the named domains – and there’s no rule against setting up your servers so that some of your customers don’t get their e-mail!

What can you do about it?  Well, the same as any customer of a free mail service… either vote with your feet and change to another provider (at the same time warning your friends not to use your old provider), or give your Customer Services a hard time and keep demanding from them information about what they are doing about putting it right.  It was Google’s decision to stop accepting mail for multiple domains, without changing the MX records for each of these domains to ensure they went to different servers, that has caused the problem.

But here’s the funniest thing… I understand that Google’s suggested resolution is not that they will fix it, but instead, that everyone else in the world should make sure that they only send mail to Google’s servers for one domain at a time!  I can’t believe that they really said that, but if they did, then you know which of the above choices you should make about your e-mail provider.

And whilst you think about it, you are failing to get some of your e-mails…  Frown

GD Star Rating
loading...